|
Written by Barbara McKenna
|
|
Friday, 24 August 2012 |
The working conditions of U.S. adjunct and contingent faculty—and, by association, the learning conditions of American college students—came under fire in a report issued Aug. 23 by the Center for the Future of Higher Education. The report, based on a 2011 survey of 500 adjunct faculty, finds two significant issues for those who make up the majority of the higher education workforce. Many are hired "just in time" to teach courses that are to begin three or fewer weeks after faculty are notified, and they have limited access to pedagogical resources.
For example, two-thirds of those responding to the survey reported receiving three weeks' notice or less to prepare for their classes. Almost all (94 percent) of survey respondents received no departmental or institutional campus orientation. In terms of sheer logistical support, respondents reported inadequate access to such basic materials as copying services, library privileges, office space, sample syllabuses and curriculum guidelines.
The report, "Who Is Professor 'Staff' and How Can This Person Teach So Many Classes?", is the work of the New Faculty Majority Foundation. The authors—Steve Street, Maria Maisto, Esther Merves and Gary Rhoades—conclude, "If universities and colleges fail to engage professors as professionals whose work extends beyond an isolated class to include interaction and relationships with other faculty as well as with students, they are also failing to engage the students in ways that clearly have a significant impact on their learning." They recommend increased transparency regarding the working conditions of contingent faculty and ask institutions to "commit themselves to collecting the data necessary to a serious study of the situation of contingent faculty and its impact on student learning."
The center's report mirrors findings of a report released in June by the Coalition on the Academic Workforce, of which the AFT is a leading member. The CAW report is the subject of the September/October AFT On Campus cover story, " Dismantling the Professoriate." Major findings of the CAW report include:
- The median pay per course, standardized to a three-credit course, was $2,700 in fall 2010, and ranged from a low of $2,235 at two-year colleges to a high of $3,400 at four-year doctoral or research universities.
- Part-time faculty respondents saw little, if any, wage premium based on their credentials.
- Professional support was minimal for part-time faculty members' work outside the classroom and for their inclusion in academic decision-making.
As with the Center for the Future of Higher Education report, the CAW report notes that information available on the working conditions of part-time faculty is minimal. The U.S. Department of Education used to collect significant data on faculty, but funding has dried up. As a result, the large and growing majority of faculty employed in contingent positions are rendered largely invisible, both as individuals on the campuses where they work and collectively in the ongoing policy discussions of higher education.
"In order to a solve a problem, you have to understand it," says Sandra Schroeder, chair of the AFT Higher Education program and policy council, president of AFT Washington and an AFT vice president. "The plight of contingent faculty is one of the most urgent problems we face in higher education. This survey will give us crucial information about the next steps to take toward systemic improvements so that students are better served in our colleges and universities."
[Tiffany Mott-Smith contributed to this post]
|
|
|
Written by Barbara McKenna
|
|
Thursday, 21 June 2012 |
|
Colleges and
universities are relying ever more heavily on part-time faculty while failing
to support them adequately. The extent of that failure-and its impact on the
majority of the higher education instructional workforce-is documented in a new
survey released this week by the Coalition
on the Academic Workforce.
Currently,
according to data from the U.S. Department of Education, 1.3 million of the 1.8
million faculty providing instruction in two- and four-year institutions are
part-time or adjunct faculty, teaching off the tenure track.
Yet,
according to CAW, higher education employers pay part-time faculty poorly, fail
to provide them the kind of academic and work supports that most professionals
rely on to do their jobs, and don't attach rewards or incentives to the
credentials their academic employees hold or earn. They also continue to offer
part-time employees work deemed "temporary," despite the fact that their
reliance on part-time faculty seems to be a permanent trend.
The
survey, "A Portrait of Part-Time Faculty Members," was conducted during the
fall semester of 2010 and was open to any faculty member or instructor who
wished to complete a questionnaire. CAW received 28,974 responses. Faculty
members in part-time positions were the largest group of respondents, providing
10,331 of the 19,850 valid responses by contingent faculty members and
instructors who were teaching at least one course in fall 2010.
The
survey's key findings include:
- The
median pay per course, standardized to a three-credit course, was $2,700 in
fall 2010, and ranged from a low of $2,235 at two-year colleges to a high of
$3,400 at four-year doctoral or research universities.
- Part-time
faculty respondents saw little, if any, wage premium based on their
credentials.
- Professional
support was minimal for part-time faculty members' work outside the classroom
and for their inclusion in academic decision-making. "Clearly, part-time
faculty are undersupported," says Bonnie Halloran, president of the Lecturers'
Employee Organization at the University of Michigan. "Part-time faculty [at the
University of Michigan] have phones, offices and access to support staff
through our collective bargaining agreement. But we have less access to professional
development opportunities, even though we make up 33 to 50 percent of the
faculty across the University of Michigan's three campuses."
- Part-time
teaching is not necessarily temporary employment, and those teaching part time
do not necessarily prefer a part-time to a full-time position. More than 80
percent of respondents reported teaching part time for more than three years,
and more than half, for more than six years. And 75 percent of respondents said
they have sought, are now seeking, or will be seeking, a full-time tenure-track
position.
- In
addition to gathering information about their academic background and other
personal characteristics, the survey asked part-time faculty respondents to
provide data for each course they taught-a total of 19,615 courses. Course
loads varied significantly among respondents. Slightly more than half taught
one or two courses during the fall 2010 term, while slightly fewer than half
taught three or more courses.
CAW is a
group of higher education associations, disciplinary associations and faculty
organizations committed to working on the issues associated with deteriorating
faculty working conditions and their effect on the success of college and
university students in the United States. The AFT is a leading member of the
group and a chief supporter of the survey.
One of
the primary features of the academic staffing crisis, says CAW, is that
information available on the working conditions of part-time faculty is
minimal. The Department of Education used to collect significant data on
faculty, but funding has dried up. As a result, the large and growing majority
employed in contingent positions are rendered largely invisible, both as
individuals on the campuses where they work and collectively in the ongoing
policy discussions of higher education.
"In
order to a solve a problem, you have to understand it," says Sandra Schroeder,
chair of the AFT Higher Education program and policy council, president of AFT
Washington and an AFT vice president. "The plight of contingent faculty is one
of the most urgent problems we face in higher education. This survey will give
us crucial information about the next steps to take toward systemic
improvements so that students are better served in our colleges and
universities."
Download the full report at www.academicworkforce.org.
|
|
|
Written by Barbara McKenna
|
|
Friday, 01 June 2012 |
|
In Arizona, the attacks on anything to do with immigrant
rights are escalating.
First it was the "papers please" law, which allowed law
enforcement agents to demand proof of immigration status from anyone they felt
might be undocumented. That law drew
strong condemnation
from the AFT Executive Council .
Then it was State Superintendent John Huppenthal and his
predecessor, state attorney general Tom Horne going after the widely admired
Mexican American Studies program in the Tucson Unified School district. Citing a law he was instrumental in getting
passed, Huppenthal has banned MAS in the schools.
Now, Huppenthal is trying to censure the University of
Arizona faculty who helped design the innovative MAS program.
If you believe faculty and teachers should be
free to design and teach a curriculum that meets the needs of students, show
your support and sign this petition!
An independent evaluation published by the Annenberg Institute shows the
MAS program's student-centered approach
is working. Students in the MAS program
far outperformed their peers on Arizona's state standardized tests in reading (by
45 percentage points), writing (by 59 percentage points), and math (by 33
percentage points), and they enroll in post-secondary institutions at a rate of
67 percent, well above the national average.
Yet Huppenthal says
such study promotes racial resentment.
Arizona faculty and
professional staff are circulating a petition that calls on Huppenthal and the Arizona state legislature to cease and
desist with their attacks on university faculty and to reinstate the Mexican
American studies curriculum in the Tucson schools. They will deliver it June 14th.
Please join the AFT in its support of Arizona colleagues and
sign
on to the petition.
|
|
|
Written by Chris Goff
|
|
Friday, 25 May 2012 |
|
Let's hear a great big AFT welcome to the part-time faculty at Kalamazoo Valley Community College in Michigan. The Michigan Employment Relations Commission counted the ballots yesterday, and by a 162-38 margin, contingent faculty members overwhelming chose representation by the KVCC Federation of Teachers, AFT-Michigan's newest affiliate.
Part-time faculty members at KVCC heralded the win as a step forward in gaining respect for the work that they do:
"The term ‘part-time' or ‘non-tenure-track' does not denote ‘inferior,'" said Dr. Catherine Barnard, a part-time psychology instructor of 15 years. "Years of service and dedication to our students should be rewarded. We have earned the right to fair compensation, academic freedom, and timely semester appointments. Our level of education, professionalism, and commitment to our students is equivalent to that of the full-time tenured faculty."
Congratulations to the KVCCFT organizing committee on a job well done, and we stand shoulder to shoulder with you as you prepare to negotiate your first contract!
|
|
|
Written by Chris Goff
|
|
Monday, 07 May 2012 |
|
The response to our Just Ask! college guide (which we produced with the American School Counselor Association) has been overwhelming, and we certainly hope that many of your are finding it useful in determining which college is right for you or your loved ones. Now, we are pleased to announce a Spanish language translation of the guide: ¡Sólo Pregunte!: ¿Qué Universidad es la adecuada para usted? We hope that Spanish-speaking prospective students and their families, as well as education professionals who work with Spanish-speaking prospective students, find this to be a useful tool for selecting an institution of higher education.
You can find both the English and Spanish versions of the Just Ask! college guide on the Just Ask! link under the FACE Toolkit tab above.
|
|
|