| Hallelujah Moments at the Ohio Summit on Academic Staffing |
| Tuesday, 06 October 2009 | |||
|
The nation's first Summit on Academic Staffing in Higher Education took place in Columbus, Ohio last week. Its intent was to bring together important stakeholders, movers and shakers to apply themselves to the challenge of finding solutions to the problem that is slowly eroding excellence in colleges and universities: the decreasing appointments of full-time, tenure-track faculty and the increasing reliance on exploited contingent academic labor. In that goal, it succeeded. On hand were state leaders and members affiliated with the three national faculty organizations, the AFT, NEA and AAUP. They were joined by state legislators and emissaries from the Ohio Board of Regents who fielded questions about the State's Strategic Plan for Higher Education which calls for Ohio to enroll 230,000 more students and raise its graduation rate by 20 percent by 2017. Finally, the management perspective was represented by an administrator who made keen suggestions about what he and his colleagues could do to rebuild the faculty. For some in the room, the revelations of the day even delivered a few hallelujah moments. One came after Amelia Hubbard painted a picture of what it is like to be a graduate teaching associate at Ohio State
"In this new model everyone loses," she said. "Undergraduates taking the class lose the experience that they gain from a more seasoned full-time professor and graduate students lose out on the time needed to cultivate their skills and learn more about their chosen field." Equally eye-opening for some were the experiences shared by Maria Maisto, who spoke both as a part-time/adjunct and as one of the co-founders of a new organization called the New Faculty Majority. Maisto described how adjuncts live one step away from being working poor.. "Hiring standards guarantee that people are hired not because they're qualified to do the job," she said, "but because they can afford to do the job. So you lose a lot of qualified educators who can't afford to do the job." Maisto’s description of the hiring practices she has encountered as a contingent faculty member reveal another way in which institutions fail to include contingent faculty as professionals in the life of the institution. "In spite of these working conditions," Maisto noted, "most of those who remain teaching are not only qualified, but also end up making enormous personal sacrifices out of a real commitment to education." The day-long summit began with a presentation of national trends and an overview of what's happening in Ohio. John B. Lee, a Washington, D.C.-based consultant, quickly explained that the increasing use of contingent faculty is a long-term trend. "We estimate that contingent faculty members and instructors teach the majority of undergraduate courses," he said. He made two significant points: Contrary to what many college presidents profess, the use of adjuncts does not correspond to a loss of revenue for instruction. In fact, during periodic recessions, state support for higher education has declined, but tuition increases have more than made up for the losses. No: institutions have shifted money away from instruction to other things; their hands are not forced to move to a contingent workforce. A number of presenters pointed to Ohio's lack of collective bargaining rights for contingent faculty and instructors as a major part of the problem. State Representative Tracy Heard, who is assistant majority floor leader, agreed that as a legislator-and as Jane Citizen-she is behind the right of part-time faculty members and graduate employees to be represented by a union. The summit ended with participants committing to continuing the momentum of the summit. They enthusiastically called out a list of next steps:
Finally, all in the room agreed of the importance of working together to get results. "To make the changes we need to see happen," said Ohio Federation of Teachers president Sue Taylor, "our organizations need to keep working together. This is for the sake of students and the state of Ohio." |
|||







I presume replicating the summit model means holding summits in other states and look forward to covering them on the NFM blog and @NewFacMajority
Colleges and universities don't distinguish between the credits that students earn in courses taught by contingent faculty and the credits that students earn in courses taught by TT faculty. Even so, they seldom credit contingent faculty for the work. That's an aspect of the scandal.
The way FACE has framed the issue more contingent faculty vs. more TT faculty may be misleading. No one wants colleges and universities to hire more contingent faculty at the expense of TT faculty. At the same time no one should want them to hire more TT faculty at the expense of contingent faculty. The pressing question is, what can unions achieve for the 800,000 contingents who are teaching now?
When enrollment and/or funding allow that is, when work is available that the current faculty are qualified and willing to do and/or when funding is available to raise their current salaries FACE should advocate that contingent faculty the current contingent faculty be made whole. But as I understand the formula in Reversing Course, AFT uses the numbers on contingent faculty to calculate the number of TT faculty who need to be hired instead. Is this right?
It's good news that legislators in Ohio are looking to recognize the bargaining rights of part-time faculty. The primary responsibility of unions is to their current membership. They aren't in the business of qualifying some members and disqualifying others. Unions that decide to represent contingent as well as TT faculty are under an obligation to represent them equally and as equally deserving entitled to job security, opportunities for advancement, and equal pay for equal work.
Reversing Course is intended to provide a means of calculating the cost of creating more full-time positions and funding contingent positions at an equitable level. It is focused on that technical issue, but as part of the FACE campaign it works from the premise of that campaign and the model legislation which calls for:
--the creation of opportunities for contingent faculty to fill full-time positions;
--priority consideration in hiring for qualified, contingent faculty members;
--pro-rata pay and benefits for contingent faculty; and,
--no job loss for current contingent faculty as an institution move to expand the number of full-time positions.
Those are the long-term goals that we will continue to work toward (and that are re-articulated in Reversing Course). Within that framework we will continue to work legislatively and through collective bargaining to improve the working conditions of contingent faculty and achieve the standards of employment that we continue to advocate for (the Standards are included on the FACE Docs page).